A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours more than the development of the wall in a coastal website in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has attracted national awareness subsequent an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres with a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances short article about René Collier along with the Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has evolved right into a very publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, look for to construct their family members house. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below planning authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their scheduling permission by building a wall outside of the boundaries of their internet site, leading to an encroachment over a Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological outcomes, especially in the delicate coastal atmosphere for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly constructed, is in the right placement. Their authorized workforce has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful improvement. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place views of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-substantial water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic in the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence of your wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water during significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the situation. On that date, the High Court listened to more submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant from the lawful timeline.
For the core on the dispute can be a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep that the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by occupation, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple basically trying to make a family property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one functions are performed based on Specialist information and authorized strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, will not alter the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how organizing disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute above building of wall at coastal web site is becoming a shorthand description for the predicament that lots of observers see as progressively widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite distinct professional backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish René Collier Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-high drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-significant h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Area of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal details, and setting up ailments. Still the human aspect stays central: neighbours who need to Dwell along with each other long once the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over design performs at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, although the implications of the case extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when essential concerns which include environmental safety and assets rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or concluded as prepared will count on the court’s findings. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to Just about the most carefully watched organizing disputes in north Dublin lately.